080: Ep76 – Evil, Suffering, God, & Ethics

Philosophy Bakes Bread radio show & podcast

In this 76th episode of Philosophy Bakes Bread Eric Thomas Weber and Anthony Cashio interview Jack Symes, host of The Panpsycast philosophy podcast, on the theme “Evil, Suffering, God, and Ethics.”

Jack Symes.

Jack graduated from the University of Liverpool in philosophy (BA and MA) and went on as a postgraduate in Teaching Studies at the University of Birmingham. Jack is currently teaching philosophy at King Edward VI High School for Girls. Jack also hosts the weekly Panpsycast philosophy Podcast. The Panpsycast describes itself as an “’informal and informative’ philosophy podcast that supports teachers, students and academics in philosophy, which also aims to awaken fellow free-thinkers worldwide and inspire a new generation of philosophers.” The show has over 70,000 subscribers!

Listen for our “You Tell Me!” questions and for some jokes in one of our concluding segments, called “Philosophunnies.” Reach out to us on Facebook @PhilosophyBakesBread and on Twitter @PhilosophyBB; email us at philosophybakesbread@gmail.com; or call and record a voicemail that we play on the show, at 859.257.1849. Philosophy Bakes Bread is a production of the Society of Philosophers in America (SOPHIA). Check us out online at PhilosophyBakesBread.com and check out SOPHIA at PhilosophersInAmerica.com.

(1 hr 8 mins)

Click here for a list of all the episodes of Philosophy Bakes Bread.

 

Subscribe to the podcast!

We’re on iTunes, Google Play, Spotify, Stitcher, and even now on YouTube, and we’ve got a regular RSS feed too!

Google Play

Logo for Spotify that links to the Spotify page for Philosophy Bakes Bread.

iTunes logo.

 

 

RSS logo feed icon and link.

Logo for how to subscribe to Stitcher.

 

 

 

Notes

  1. The logo for the Panscycast, featuring a head and colorful brain.The Panpsycast podcast.
  2. Cosmological argument,” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  3. Heraclitus,” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy..
  4. Parmenides,” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy..
  5. Rober Pirsig’s Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance.
  6. Peter Singer and utilitarianism.
  7. The Abrahamic God, refers to the God of Abraham, of the traditions of Judaism, Christianity, or Islam. See Rabbi Marc Gellman and Monsignor Thomas Hartman, “Abrahamic Faiths All Worship the Same God,” The Chicago Tribune, June 6, 2003.
  8. The OOO God: Ominopotent (all powerful), Omniscient (all knowing), and Omnibenevolent (all good).
  9. Stephen Law’s blog, philosopher of religion.
  10. Kenneth Hill, population expert.
  11. The Problem of Evil or the Problem of Suffering, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  12. Theodicies,” the technical term for responses to the problem of evil.
  13. Young Jack Symes.Young Jack Symes photo. Why? Because the photo is adorable and suffering is a heavy topic 😉
  14. Telos, which refers to purpose.
  15. Sudio headphones.
  16. Albert Camus, “The Myth of Sisyphus.”
  17. William James,” in the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, a psychologist and philosopher and one of the founders of the tradition known as American Pragmatism. From The Varieties of Religious Experience, Jack quotes James, who wrote that “Good-humor is a philosophic state of mind; it seems to say to Nature that we take her no more seriously than she takes us. I maintain that one should always talk of philosophy with a smile.”
  18. Charles Pidgen on the “is/ought” dichotomy in Philosophy Now.
  19. Jeremy Bentham,” in the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  20. Christian Miller, on The Character Gap.

 

 

You Tell Me!

For our future “You Tell Me!” segments, Jack asked the following question in this episode:

“Why is a good God significantly more reasonable than an evil God?”

Let us know what you think! Via TwitterFacebookEmail, or by commenting here below.

066: Ep62 – Is the Church Killing God?

Philosophy Bakes Bread radio show & podcast

In this 62nd episode of the Philosophy Bakes Bread radio show and podcast, Eric Thomas Weber and Anthony Cashio interview philosopher and Pentecostal Christian Dr. J. Aaron Simmons on his question: “Is the Church Killing God?”

Dr. J. Aaron Simmons.

Aaron is associate professor of Philosophy at Furman University in Greenville, South Carolina. He works primarily in philosophy of religion and 19th and 20th Century European Philosophy, but also researches political philosophy and environmental philosophy. He has authored a number of books, including God and the Other, The New Phenomenology, Re-examining Deconstruction and Determinate Religion, and Kierkegaard and Levinas: Ethics, Politics, and Religion.

Listen for our “You Tell Me!” questions and for some jokes in one of our concluding segments, called “Philosophunnies.” Reach out to us on Facebook @PhilosophyBakesBread and on Twitter @PhilosophyBB; email us at philosophybakesbread@gmail.com; or call and record a voicemail that we play on the show, at 859.257.1849. Philosophy Bakes Bread is a production of the Society of Philosophers in America (SOPHIA). Check us out online at PhilosophyBakesBread.com and check out SOPHIA at PhilosophersInAmerica.com.

 

(1 hr 20 mins)

Click here for a list of all the episodes of Philosophy Bakes Bread.

 

Notes

  1. William McDonald, “Soren Kierkegaard,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 1996 / 2017.
  2. Durer’s northern renaissance art, described in The New York Times.
  3. Titian, the painter’s biography.
  4. Wordsworth’s The Prelude, 1850.
  5. Biography of poet Veronica Franco.
  6. St. Augustine of Hippo, on ChristianityToday.com.
  7. Article in The New York Times and another in the Huffington Post crediting St. Augustine with the phrase: “The Church is a whore; but she is my mother.”
  8. Kenosis, Meriam-Webster defines as: “the relinquishment of divine attributes by Jesus Christ in becoming human.” Dr. Simmons uses the word “kenotic,” at one point, referring to this meaning, as the character of such relinquishing.
  9. Michael Tooley, “The Problem of Evil,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2002 / 2015.
  10. “Pneumatology,” according to Bible.org, refers to “the study of the biblical doctrine of the Holy Spirit. Generally, this includes such topics as the personality of the Spirit, the deity of the Spirit, and the work of the Spirit throughout Scripture.” Dr. Simmons uses the phrase “Pneumatological imagination,” to refer to thinking that centers on the Holy Spirit.
  11. “Turing machine,” refers to a machine that is made to try to pass as though it is a person, whom you cannot distinguish from a person, in terms of its responses to your interactions with it, assuming you cannot see the machine or imagined person responding. For more information, see David Barker, “Turing Machines,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 1995 / 2012.
  12. Dr. Simmons brings up a clever quote, whose source he suggests might have been Mark Twain. The line was: “The first casualty of war is the truth.” The Guardian published a piece which suggests that the earliest version of this line comes from Aeschylus, who wrote that: “In war, truth is the first casualty.” See “Who coined the phrase, ‘The first casualty of War is Truth’?The Guardian.
  13. Acts 2:45, according to Biblehub.org, reads “They sold property and possessions to give to anyone who had need.”
  14. C.S. Lewis, “Learning in Wartime,” on CSLewis.com.
  15. The blog that Aaron co-founded, called “Philosophy Goes to Church.”

 

You Tell Me!

For our future “You Tell Me!” segments, Aaron posed the following question in this episode:

“What are your questions? And, when you encounter someone new, what if you asked them ‘What’s your story?’ and ‘What are your questions?’?”

Let us know what you think! Via TwitterFacebookEmail, or by commenting here below.

057: Ep53 – Kneeling and Civil Protest

Philosophy Bakes Bread radio show & podcast

Dr. Arnold Farr.In this fifty-third episode of the Philosophy Bakes Bread radio show and podcast, we interview Dr. Arnold Farr about “Kneeling and Civil Protest,” concerning the conflicts that have arisen in the last few months about football star Colin Kaepernick and many others who followed his example.

Embed from Getty Images

Arnold is a professor of philosophy at The University of Kentucky. He authored Critical Theory and Democratic Vision: Herbert Marcuse and Recent Liberation Philosophies. He is currently writing a new book on The New White Supremacy. He is focusing on race and African Philosophy. In addition to these works, Arnold has written numerous articles and book chapters on subjects like German idealism, Marxism, critical theory, and philosophy of race. In addition to his writings, Arnold is the founder of the International Herbert Marcuse Society.

Listen for our “You Tell Me!” questions and for some jokes in one of our concluding segments, called “Philosophunnies.” Reach out to us on Facebook @PhilosophyBakesBread and on Twitter @PhilosophyBB; email us at philosophybakesbread@gmail.com; or call and record a voicemail that we play on the show, at 859.257.1849. Philosophy Bakes Bread is a production of the Society of Philosophers in America (SOPHIA). Check us out online at PhilosophyBakesBread.com and check out SOPHIA at PhilosophersInAmerica.com.

 

(1 hr 4 mins)

Click here for a list of all the episodes of Philosophy Bakes Bread.

 

iTunes logo.Google PlayRSS logo feed icon and link.

Subscribe to the podcast! 

We’re on iTunes and Google Play, and we’ve got a regular RSS feed too!

 

Notes

  1. John Branch, “The Awakening of Colin Kaepernick,” The New York Times, September 7, 2017.
  2. The Editors of GQ, “Colin Kaepernick Is GQ‘s 2017 Citizen of the Year,” and “Colin Kaepernick Will Not Be Silenced,” GQ, November 13, 2017.
  3. The International Herbert Marcuse Society.

 

You Tell Me!

For our future “You Tell Me!” segments, Arnold posed the following question in this episode:

“What is democracy and how can we achieve it?”

Let us know what you think! Via TwitterFacebookEmail, or by commenting here below.

 

Transcript

(more…)

Faith and Betrayal of the Philosophical Method

Civil American, Volume 1, Article 3 (December 4, 2016), https://goo.gl/7lDv6l.

| By Shane Courtland |

Please note: The following essay is autobiographical. I thought it might be helpful to share my experience. As with all personal events, those who have experienced this on the other side have very different feelings about the situation.

The way I have always viewed philosophy, regarding its practice and how it should be taught, is as a method of thinking. As philosophers, we are tasked to apply rigorous critical thinking to complicated abstract concepts and dilemmas. There are no domain restrictions; there can literally be a philosophy-of-anything. Thus, we find ourselves entangled with debates in politics, religion, ethics, physics, mathematics, ad infinitum.

Print of 'Discourse into the Night,' of two men sitting in a discussion.

While it is true that a goal of the philosophical method is to seek the truth, I wouldn’t say that it is completely preoccupied with holding true beliefs. Let me explain. After years of obsessing over this method, it has rendered most (if not all) of my beliefs tentative. I realize that one discussion, essay, or argument may compel me to abandon a cherished belief.

PETA's logo.I know this because I have suffered from it countless times. I have been a dedicated theist. Now I am a hardcore atheist. I used to be an animal rights advocate. I was an ethical vegetarian for four years and I ran a local chapter of PETA. Now I am skeptical about the moral standing of animals. I used to be a Kantian. Now I am a Hobbesian. I used to push for egalitarian redistribution. Now I tend to embrace libertarianism.

Philosophy, in a sense, is like drinking Drano. Sure it cleans out the ill-justified beliefs, but it can leave you somewhat empty. The subjective convictions of your beliefs post-philosophy are never as strong as the subjective convictions pre-philosophy. Many of my non-philosophical friends and relatives are critical of my post philosophical-self. When I have discussions with them, at some point, I inevitably receive this rebuff: “Whatever, Shane… but… you don’t really believe anything.”

There is, however, something I believe in – the method. I cannot quit the method. Beliefs come and go, but my stake in this method is forever. It has become a part of my very identity. To use a religious expression, to a philosopher the method is the true faith.

My teaching reflects this faith. I tell my students that I don’t care what views they argue for in their papers or in class discussion. My job is to assess their application of the method. If they are competently using the method to argue for crazy or morally repugnant views, they will get a good grade – PERIOD.

(more…)